User talk:Zache

Patsaat Suomessa

Hei!

Aluksi kiitos joistain hienoista Turku-kuvista, joita olet lisännyt. Sitten otsikon mukaiseen asiaan: Valokuvat Suomessa sijaitsevista patsaista eivät ikävä kyllä kelpaa Commonsiin. Asiasta tarkemmin sivulla Commons:Freedom of panorama#Finland. Kuvat voi siirtää suomenkieliseen Wikipediaan, jos niitä käytetään taiteilijasta, patsaasta tms. kertovan artikkelin yhteydessä. Samulili 14:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeps, tuon perusteella sama pätee kaikkiin kirjan kansiin sun muuhun tauhkaan myös eli jos niitä lisäilee niin ne pitäisi pistää kansalliseen wikipediaan commonsin sijasta? Päteekö tuo sama myös muihin kuin suomen kansalaisiin, eli voiko vaikka brittituristi lisätä lomamatkalla ottamansa suomalaisen patsaskuvan commonsiin ja lykkiä kuvan käyttöön enkkuwikipediaan vai onko sekin copyvio? Noh, pistin poistolistalle käyttämättömät patsaskuvat ~~ja siirtelen käytössäolevat suomiwikipediaan jahka kerkeän.~~ Tehty. Siihen ei varmaan ole mitään valmista kivaa automaagista työkalua? --Zache 15:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kyllä, kirjojen kannet yms. myös paikalliseen Wikipediaan. Commonsiin siirtämiseen on työkaluja, mutta Commonsista siirtämiseen ei taida olla... Samulili 14:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Wikiuutiset rendering problem.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikiuutiset rendering problem.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Johney (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kurt_Vonnegut-Welcome_to_the_monkey_house_-_paperback_cover.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Kurt_Vonnegut-Welcome_to_the_monkey_house_-_paperback_cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Nard 21:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kurt_Vonnegut_-_Cat's_Cradle_-_paperback_cover.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Kurt_Vonnegut_-_Cat's_Cradle_-_paperback_cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Nard 21:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pinella_nähtynä_joelta.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Pinella_nähtynä_joelta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zache (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scanner_Darkly_gameboy.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Scanner_Darkly_gameboy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. If you disagree with the deletion, you can make an appeal at Commons:Undeletion requests. Regards. —Giggy 03:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunilan tehtaiden kuva

Terve! Yllä mainittuun kuvaan on merkitty koordinaatit, jotka osoittavat Hallaan Sunilan tehtaiden kaakkoispuolelle [1]. Kuvanottopaikka on kai kuitenkin kuvassa näkyvistä maisemista päätellen jossain Kotkansaaren pohjoisrannalla ja selvästi veden pinnan yläpuolella (laivan savupiippu kuvan alalaidassa), ehkä tällä mäellä [2] tai jonkin talon ylemmissä kerroksissa. En saanut tuota paikkaa aivan varmasti kohdalleen sihdattua, mutta ehkäpä itse osaat sen parhaiten korjata. --AB (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Varmaankin sillä mäellä. Tarkemmin niin olettaisin et siitä duunaripatsaiden luota olen ottanu tuon mut en muista kyl enää varmasti. (Olen ainoastaan kerran käyny kotkassa ja silloin otin aika lailla kuvia) --Zache 16:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Korjasin koordinaatit mäelle, kyllä kuva sieltä on otettu, jos ei jostain rakennuksesta. Siellä näyttää kaupungin sivujen mukaan olevan Ahtaajat-niminen patsas. Itse en ole Kotkassa (tai tarkkaan ottaen keskustassa Kotkansaarella) koskaan käynyt. Aloin vain ihmetellä noita kuvan koordinaatteja, kun olin laittamassa koordinaatteja Sunilan tehtaille wikipedian puolella, ja tehdas näytti olevan väärin päin verrattuna Kansalaisen karttapaikan ilmakuviin. --AB (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:KotkaCityHall.jpg

Hei! Tein tuohon kuvaan perspektiivikorjausta. Toivottavasti voit kelpuuttaa lopputuloksen. Samulili (talk) 13:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Zache!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ron Paul's blimp - cropped.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Leningrad Oblast OSM.svg was uncategorized on 2 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:HideUsersButton hidei.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:HideUsersButton show.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Fiwiki avaruusestetty.png was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Fiwiki avaruusestoilmoitus.png was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:FlaggedRevs-revreview-noflagged2-fi.png was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:FlaggedRevs-reject-fi.png was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:FlaggedRevs-reviewlog-fi.png was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj Dubai at night.jpg

File:Burj Dubai at night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 04:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj Dubai at night.jpg

File:Burj Dubai at night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 04:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moonset and sunrise at the Burj Dubai 2009.jpg

File:Moonset and sunrise at the Burj Dubai 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ZooFari 04:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 0796cd0b55980017d8762411a27cd498

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Assagne2.svg

Hello, what process did you use to convert this image to SVG? Whatabout the PNG version? --Hydrox (talk) 17:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First i upscaled the original image to 7500x5000 resolution and converted it to four color and saved it to png with Gimp. This was mostly for getting rid of jpeg artifacts. Then i traced the result with Inkscape (Trace bitmap -tool). Inkscape's trace bitmap is basically GUI for program named Potrace so it can be done from commandline if Inkscape uses too much memory. Png version is made with same method and it is lower resolution than 7500x5000 because Commons didn't handle high resolution png-files. --Zache (talk) 18:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just curious. It works quite well, although technically this is not really the best possible solution. One would require the original lossless JPEG source for a "true" PNG conversion. Now it is basically just a processed version of the JPEG. The 4-color conversion has caused noticeable loss of sharpness, for example (compare 1 & 2 in side-by-side browser tabs) --Hydrox (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assagne2.svg

File:Assagne2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Karppinen (talk) 12:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assange 4c.png

File:Assange 4c.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Karppinen (talk) 12:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linkclassifier example - Ajankohtaista.png

I'm sorry, but are You certain that You are the author of content in File:Linkclassifier example - Ajankohtaista.png? JDavid (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC) ccb88c6ae10e0acc62e272fb875dc063[reply]

TUSC token ccb88c6ae10e0acc62e272fb875dc063

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File tagging File:Geoffrey Dummer.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Geoffrey Dummer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

– Adrignola talk 15:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FlaggedRevs-articlehistory-fi.png

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:FlaggedRevs-articlehistory-fi.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: You are not the author by taking a screenshot. Wrong license/copyright tag. It is probably {{Free screenshot|license=PD-ineligible}}. More or less simple lists.

Saibo (Δ) 03:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PD-ineligible is even more wrong than that what i used because Wikipedia is not pd. (wikipedia is crosslicenced CC & GFDL) but feel free to fix licence texts. I dont really care too much about it when picture is screenshot from wikipedia user interface itself. Another reason is that i don't really have clue what there should be in author field (Creative Commons part is clear case) if one is using content from other wikimedia projects. (Long list of contributors of wikipedia including software maybe... ) --Zache (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's texts are under CC-by-sa3.0 and GFDL - but not the interface. That could be GPL (the license of MediaWiki) - so if you think it could be copyright eligible then something of those software licenses. Well, and the WIkiball is claimed to be copyrighted by Wikimedia {{WikimediaCopyrightWarning}}. We also do have {{Wikimedia project screenshot}} which tries to get it right. ;) Best is: try to include as few stuff as possible on screenshots. That is also better for the help page where it is included. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip K Dick android head2.jpg

File:Philip K Dick android head2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Simonxag (talk) 09:23, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uyghur Adam Tomak.png (Deletion requests)

No, actually I did not send an permission email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. When I send it, can the deletion be undone? --BaratK (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't clear enough in the deletion page. The person who should send the email is the copyright holder aka (b.kurbanjan@yahoo.com) and based on his email he already sended the OTRS-permit. Not sure what happened to it. I think that you can ask from somebody what is status of the permit and if it is OK you can upload the picture. Btw, stop sock puppeting please. It makes extremely hard to follow discussions and people will make the mistakes like i did in the deletion page. (i answered to you like i thinked that you were b.kurbanhan) --Zache (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry for writing so late. My former account BaratK was blocked from editing. Actually I am not (b.kurbanjan@yahoo.com). I send an email to the copyright holder (he even do not set any copyright at all) to ask him what happed with his OTRS permission. It would be nice if you can keep in contact with him, because the User Mendsetting really put an racist eye on this picture intending to delete this picture again and again. Sincerly. --BaaratK (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Käyttäjämäärien lasku

Hei, vilkaisepa käyttäjän tekemiä muokkauksia (osissa perusteluitakin) ja sitten varsinkin, miten heppoisesti ne on kumottu. Sitten ovat uudet yritykset perusteluineen, mutta heti poisto ja samalla joku rekisteröitynyt, kenties jo aikoja sitten poislähtenyt käyttäjä (ei yhteyttä osoitettu) saa rangaistukseksi vuoden kestävän kiellon. Eipä ihme, että käyttäjämäärät laskevat. --212.226.41.100 21:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Tämä sama viesti oli fi-Wikin keskustelusivullasi, mutta se "tietysti" poistettiin alta aikayksikön.

En nyt lähde pohtimaan oletko se käyttäjä jonka vuoksi Otrfan muokkauksesi kumosi. Yleisenä neuvona sanoisin, että luo käyttäjätunnus ja muokkaa asiallisesti sen avulla. Mikäli olet lisäksi se henkilö joksi Otrfan sinua kuvittelee neuvon myös aloittamaan kommenttipyynnön jossa teet jonkun rakentavan ehdotuksen siitä miten voit muokata Wikipediaa yhdessä Otrfanin ja muiden kanssa. --Zache (talk) 05:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sitaattioikeus

Hei Zache olen uusi Paasikivi-käyttäjä commonsissa ja olen ottanut monia kuvia Helsingin patsaista ja kaaupungin yleisistä rakennuksista sekä kaupunki maisemista. Siirsit muutamia ottamia kuviani sitaattioikeus-muotoon. Voitko tehdä niin kaikille kuville jotka ovat uhkana copyrightin vaikutukseen. Ehdotan yhteistyötä jatkossa. voimme tehdä niin että minä lataan kuvan ja te voitte sen tarkistaa niin että voiko sen siirtää toiseen muotoon niin että sen voi julkaista commonsissa ilman ongelmia. Ystävällisin terveisin--Paasikivi (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eiköhän tuo onnistu. Teen sen verran rajausta noissa fiwikiin siirrettävissä kuvissa, että mikäli on useita kuvia samasta aiheesta niin siirrän parhaat. Eli pyrin siirtämään sellaisia kuvia jotka voin saman tien tai lyhyen artikkelin kirjoittamalla käyttämään jossain artikkelissa. --Zache (talk) 08:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimaps

Do you want to participate in drafting Wikimaps?

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Zache,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team

File:G A Petrelius muistomerkki Turku.jpg

File:G A Petrelius muistomerkki Turku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Siirrot

Tekninen ongelma pyytämissäsi siirroissa. Ei muka saisi olla wikitext content. --Pitke (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pitke: Missä niistä? Toinen idea on, että kokeile siirtämiseen sijaan vain copypastettaa tekstit jos se määrittää sivun tyypin sivun luontivaiheessa.--Zache (talk) 09:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiloves monuments 2017 Finland

Hei,

Viime päivinä tallettamissasi kuvissa on mukana kaksi monumenttimallinetta joista toinen viittaa Wikidatan Imatran Rajamuseoon ja toinen Imatran Immolan kasarmialueeseen. Miksi nämä molemmat toistuvat eri kuvissa, esim. File:Tampereen Palatsinraitinsilta ja Kotkankallio.jpg? MKFI (talk) 06:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Käytin niitä noiden id-mallineiden testaamiseen ja kuvausteksti tuli siitä testilinkistä jolla avastin uploadwizardin kampanjan. --Zache (talk) 09:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in Finland

Hi Zache, I am the coordinator of the international team responsible for the special upload wizards and banners. The request you placed on the notice board I fixed, but I am not happy about this. There are still not working properly, and also with the start of the contest I need to know which campaigns are used to activate them. But first of all, please explain to me what the purpose is of each of these separate campaigns. Romaine (talk) 03:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: : What is broken? --Zache (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain first my question: what is the purpose of each of these separate campaigns? Romaine (talk) 03:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basically there is two campaigns which are really in use (Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-wikidata and Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-url) and the other two (Campaign:wlm-fi-wikidata, Campaign:wlm-fi-url are redundant because it simplified things when we linked always to the rephotography campaigns.

Main campaign what users are using is Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-wikidata which will add the wikidata ID of the target object from the upload link in the list. All targets in wikidata based lists are things which have either RKY or suitable kyppi id:s in the wikidata OR they are part of the objects with the RKY or suitable Kyppi id:s in wikidata. The RKY, Kyppi id:s are identifires from the National Board of Antiquities of Finland.

The another campaign Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-url is just for the failback in cases if somebody photographs something which aren't in our wikidata based lists but it have RKY or Kyppi ID so they need to give link to it in the campaign upload page and we can parse ID from the link. With separate campaign we also know that it is uploaded using url.

Rephotography thing is that if the picture is rephotography (example )of the older picture then give link to the original picture. --Zache (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: explained. --Zache (talk) 03:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation!

To make it simple, these two can thus be deleted? Campaign:wlm-fi-wikidata & Campaign:wlm-fi-url

If someone participates in the WLM contest of Finland who does not speak Finnish, how does the uploader know how to fill in the extra fields?

And also, for the uploader, bot Finnish ans not Finnish speaking participants, it must be clear which upload link to use.

In preparation of WLM in Finland, we already had created some time ago Campaign:wlm-fi + Template:Cultural Heritage Finland. This template has as purpose to identify which monument is on the photo. This campaign is linked from Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2017/Participating countries.

Now I go to bed first, tomorrow I will have a closer look at it and will try to fix the other issues. I did already solved a first big problem: if someone uploads now an image in the contest, it actually is part of the contest. Romaine (talk) 04:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign:wlm-fi-wikidata & Campaign:wlm-fi-url can be deleted and I tested the changes you made and now url-parameters are working. About the non finnish speaking participants. In perfect world there would be participation info in swedish (our second official language) and english. In campaigns there should be also translation texts for mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-wikidata-id, mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-kyppi-url and mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-rephotography-source-url with links to the participation info in swedish nd english. However currently there is nothing in swedish or english and it is in our todo lists and in this point of morning i still try to keep focus on technical stuff but if there is nothing at the evening maybe then i will write/translate the guides least for the english. --Zache (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you can translate to English the MediaWiki pages you linked, I will implement it. Romaine (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, texts are below. Pitke was trying to add already the link to guide pages in finnish yesterday, but there was update delay between editing the mediawiki pages and actual change at the uploadwizard dialog an we were waiting to see the effects. However here are the texts and link text from Pitke's edit was too long so I edited them shorter now. Anyway feel free to put texts to live :) thanks --Zache (talk) 04:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

page	Finnish	English	Swedish
mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-wikidata-id	Kuvattavan kohteen Wikidata-tunniste	Wikidata ID for the subject of the photo
mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-kyppi-url	Linkki kuvattavan kohteen tietosivulle kyppi.fi tai rky.fi -sivustoilla. (ohje).	Link to the info page of the subject of the photograph at kyppi.fi or rky.fi. (Instructions).
mediawiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-fi-rephotography-source-url	Rephotography-kuvassa linkki alkuperäiseen kuvaan. (ohje).	Link to the original photograph in the case of a Rephotography image. (Instructions).

Implemented - if you want to make any changes or add translations, both to the special upload wizards or these pages, please let me know. Romaine (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: If it is possibe would you like to auto add the category:Unchecked images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Finland to the Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-wikidata and Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-url. It is hidden tracking category for the checking the new images so that we know which ones we are checked already and which one is in todo list. --Zache (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Zache/common.js

Hi Zache, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Zache/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 3 character 65: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: var cat=mw.config.get("wgPageName").replace("Category:", "")

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Code issues in User:Zache/common.js

Hi Zache, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Zache/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 4 character 191: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: url="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Turku?fastcci=%7B%22c1%22%3A"+cat+"%2C%22c2%22%3A%2255661878%22%2C%22d1%22%3A15%2C%22d2%22%3A15%2C%22s%22%3A200%2C%22a%22%3A%22and%22%7D"

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to the Structured Commons focus group!

Hello! Thank you very much for signing up to the community focus group for Structured Commons :-)

How to organize ourselves?

This focus group is new and experimental, and I welcome your tips and thoughts on how we can organize this in the most convenient and productive way. For now, I have posted a few separate topics on the focus group's talk page. Please add your questions there too! If we all add that page to our watchlist, that's probably a good way to stay up to date with current discussions. Steinsplitter has also initiated a brand new IRC channel specifically for Structured Commons: wikimedia-commons-sd ^(webchat) which we invite you to join. Please let me know if you have other ideas on how to work together.

Current updates

For your agenda: IRC office hour about Structured Commons, Tuesday 21 November at 18:00 UTC in wikimedia-office ^(webchat).
A newsletter about Structured Commons is sent out later today. Its frequency will probably increase from now on. You are warmly invited to contribute to next issues — don't hesitate to add updates.
The documentation and info pages about Structured Data on Commons have received a thorough (and much overdue) update this week, in order to get them ready for all the upcoming work. Obsolete pages were archived. There are undoubtedly still a lot of omissions and bits that are unclear. You can help by editing boldly, and by leaving feedback and tips on the talk pages.
More things (logo? tools?) to be discussed on the focus group's talk page!

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 13:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Commons focus group update, Nov 21, 2017

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for the the community focus group for Structured Commons :-)

IRC office hour today, 21 November, 18.00 UTC

The IRC office hour about Structured Commons takes place at 18:00 UTC in wikimedia-office ^webchat. Amanda, Ramsey and I will give updates about the project, and you can ask us questions. The log will be published afterwards.

Tools update

Many important community tools for Commons and Wikidata will benefit from an update to structured data in the future. You can help indicate which tools will need attention:

Check this Google spreadsheet and leave your comments (ping me if you'd like full editing access to the spreadsheet)
More and more tools will also be tracked on Phabricator and on the tools inventory page. Feel free to add and edit.

Warmly, your community liaison SandraF (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Commons focus group update, December 11, 2017

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for the community focus group for Structured Commons :-)

Later this week, a full newsletter will be distributed, but you are the first to receive an update on new requests for feedback.

Three requests for feedback

We received many additions to the spreadsheet that collects important Commons and Wikidata tools. Thank you! Now, you can participate in a survey that helps us understand and prioritize which tools and functionalities are most important for the Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata communities. The survey runs until December 22. Here's some background.
Help the team decide on better names for 'captions' and 'descriptions'. You can provide input until January 3, 2018.
Help collect interesting Commons files, to prepare for the data modelling challenges ahead! Continuous input is welcome there.

Warmly, your community liaison SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) - 16:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Commons - Design feedback request: Multilingual Captions

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for the the community focus group for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons.

The Structured Data on Commons team has a new design feedback request up for Multilingual Captions support in the Upload Wizard. Visit the page for more information about the potential designs. Discussion and feedback is welcome there.

On a personal note, you'll see me posting many of these communications going forward for the Structured Data project, as SandraF transitions into working on the GLAM side of things for Structured Data on Commons full time. For the past six months she's been splitting time between the two roles (GLAM and Community Liaison). I'm looking forward to working with you all again. Thank you, happy editing. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - What gets stored where (Ontology)

Greetings,

There is a new feedback request for Structured Data on Commons (link for messages posted to Commons: , regarding what metadata from a file gets stored where. Your participation is appreciated.

Happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First structured licensing conversation on Commons

Greetings,

The first conversation about structured copyright and licensing for Structured Data on Commons has been posted, please come by and participate. The discussion will be open through the end of the month (March). Thank you. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Botti ja lisenssin tarkistus

Hei, kun sun botti User:FinnaUploadBot lataa tiedostoja, niin eikö niiden lisenssit pitäisi kuitenkin tarkistuttaa mallineella {{LicenseReview}}? Mä olen ymmärtänyt, että sellainen pitäisi laittaa kaikkiin ulkopuolisilta sivuilta ladattuihin kuviin. -kyykaarme (talk) 09:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Selvitellään. Olet varmaan oikeassa ainakin yksittäisten kuvien kohdalla, mutta en tiedä miten homman pitäisi toimia jos kuvia on enemmän. --Zache (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minullakin olisi muutamia huomioita bottiin liittyen.

Kuvaajan nimi pitäisi ottaa kuvaustiedoista.
- Kuvaajan nimen mainitseminen on pakollista, jotta kuva voi ylipäätään olla Commonsissa.
Organization-parametriksi organisaatio (esim. Museovirasto tai Helsingin kaupunginmuseo) mutta ei kokoelmaa.
- Kannattaa käyttää Institution-mallinetta silloin, kun sellainen on.
Department-parametriksi tulee sitten kokoelmatiedot. (Ainakin Museovirasto edellyttää niidenkin mainitsemista.)
Accession number -parametriksi pitäisi lisätä museon inventaarionumero, ei URL:n loppua.

Edellisten lisäksi tietysti esimerkiksi Depicted place -parametrin voi ottaa suoraan Finnan Aiheen paikka -parametrista.

Esimerkinomaisesti muokkasin parin kuvan tietoja:

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 14:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vielä lisäys: Permission-parametriksi kopioisin suoraan Finnan Kuvan käyttöoikeus -tekstin kokonaisuudessaan. Näin siksi, että esimerkiksi Museoviraston kuvien osalta Museovirasto määrittelee, mitä tietoja lähteestä (vähintään) on ilmoitettava, kun kuvaa käytetään. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 14:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiitos, suurin juttu tässä on ollut se, että pitäisi repiä jostain aikaa tuon päivittämiseen.--Zache (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Apalsola: FinnaUploadBot:sta tuli noottia, että sillä pitäisi olla bottimerkintä (Commons:Bots/Requests/FinnaUploadBot) ja, että samalla tuli kuittausta siitä, että suoja-ajan umpeutumisen jälkeen ei kuvia pitäisi enää lisensoida CC-BY:llä. Tuosta jälkimmäisestä olen Majoran kanssa sikäli eri mieltä, että jokin suoja museoilla on arkistojensa vaikka se ei olisi suoraan kuvan suoja joten asiasta vääntämisellä ei voi kuin hävitä ja paljon parempi tie on edistää asioita hitaasti positiivisten esimerkkien kautta.

Joka tapauksessa bottimerkintä vaatii commonsin aktiivien osanottoa keskusteluun ja tein noista ylläolevista korjausehdotuksista jo kaikki muut paitsi tuon permission-parametrin sisällön jonka voisi tietysti selvyyden vuoksi jatkossa kopioida myös. --Zache (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:FinnaUploadBot. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Majora (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notification. --Zache (talk) 16:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multilingual captions testing is available

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wikipedia vandalism in Google infobox from flagged revisions stabilized article 25.2.2015.png

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wikipedia vandalism in Google infobox from flagged revisions stabilized article 25.2.2015.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What properties does Commons need?

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WLM: European Special Award - European Cultural Heritage

Dear Zache,

as one of this year's local WLM organizers, we want to let you know about a special award being distributed this year.

With 2018 being the European Year of Cultural Heritage, operating with the slogan “Sharing Heritage”, Wikimedia Deutschland is participating in this Europe-wide project with various activities.

One aspect is a special award that will be given within the WLM contest for the pictures that best capture European Cultural Heritage (the final formulation for the criteria will be published soon). An international jury will be choosing the winners from the national submissions made by the national juries to the international WLM contest.

The following prizes will be awarded to the winners:

1. Up to € 1000 in in-kind prize,

2. Up to € 700 in in-kind prize,

3. Up to € 300 in in-kind prize.

We invite you to spread this information in your national contest and with your national jury, making them aware of this special opportunity. The winners will be announced at the end of the year. More info on criteria and distribution will be published soon on the international WLM site. The German project site can be found here.

In case you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Enjoy the summer and the heat and with kind regards from Berlin, --Maria Heuschkel (WMDE) (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - Depicts statements draft requirements

Greetings,

A slide presentation of the draft requirements for depicts statements on file pages is up on Commons. Please visit this page on Commons to review the slides and discuss the draft. Thank you, see you on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - structured licensing and copyright

Mockups of structured licensing and copyright statements on file pages are posted. Please have a look over the examples and leave your feedback on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New discussion on Commons talk:Structured data

Hello. I've started a new, important discussion about creating properties for Commons on Wikidata. Please come join in, if the process is something that interests you or if you can help. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - upcoming changes to viewing old file page revisions

How old revisions of file pages work are likely going to have to change for structured data. There is information about the change on the SDC hub talk page, please read it over and leave feedback if you have any. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hours today, 4 October

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 4 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - search prototype

There is a search prototype for structured data on Commons available. Please visit the search prototype page on the structured data hub for information on testing and feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists selected

Kansalliskirjaston eteläsali
Valokuva: Marit Henriksson
Helsingin tuomiokirkko
Valokuva: Julie Tsarfati
Herttoniemen kartano
Valokuva: Edwardina von Boxis
Hossan värikallion kalliomaalaus
Valokuva: Eerik Lehto
Petäjäveden vanha kirkko talvipäivänä
Valokuva: Maarit Siitonen
Sunilan tehtaat ja asuinalue. "Maailman kaunein tehdasrakennus" talvella kuvattuna Kymijoen Huumanhaaran yli.
Valokuva: Janiwiki0
Tampereen tuomiokirkon katto
Valokuva: Old Pionear
Särestöniemen erämaatila ja ateljee, maatilan sauna
Valokuva: Hti-358
Tönnönkosken silta ja myllypaikka
Valokuva: Pia Simonen
Vaajakosken vanha vesivoimalaitos
Valokuva: Teuvo Salmenjoki

Finalistit / Finalists

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments -valokuvauskilpailuun!

Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 3464 kuvaa 98 kuvaajalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Tuomaristoon kuuluivat valokuvataiteilija Mojo Erämetsä, graafikko Tommi Kovala, rehtori Riitta Moisander, vierailijaprofessori Elina Paasonen, valokuvaaja Jussi Tiainen ja valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä.

Suomen kilpailusarjan voittaja julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18.11.2018 klo 13.00. Tervetuloa!

Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating Wiki Loves Monuments photography contest!

Altogether 3464 images from 98 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The jury members were photography artist Mojo Erämetsä, graphic designer Tommi Kovala, rector Riitta Moisander, visiting professor Elina Paasonen, photographer Jussi Tiainen and photographer Soile Tirilä.

The winner of the Finnish competition will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18 November at 1.00 pm. Welcome!

On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists selected

Kansalliskirjaston eteläsali
Valokuva: Marit Henriksson
Helsingin tuomiokirkko
Valokuva: Julie Tsarfati
Herttoniemen kartano
Valokuva: Edwardina von Boxis
Hossan värikallion kalliomaalaus
Valokuva: Eerik Lehto
Petäjäveden vanha kirkko talvipäivänä
Valokuva: Maarit Siitonen
Sunilan tehtaat ja asuinalue. "Maailman kaunein tehdasrakennus" talvella kuvattuna Kymijoen Huumanhaaran yli.
Valokuva: Janiwiki0
Tampereen tuomiokirkon katto
Valokuva: Old Pionear
Särestöniemen erämaatila ja ateljee, maatilan sauna
Valokuva: Hti-358
Tönnönkosken silta ja myllypaikka
Valokuva: Pia Simonen
Vaajakosken vanha vesivoimalaitos
Valokuva: Teuvo Salmenjoki

Finalistit / Finalists

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments -valokuvauskilpailuun!

Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 3464 kuvaa 98 kuvaajalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Tuomaristoon kuuluivat valokuvataiteilija Mojo Erämetsä, graafikko Tommi Kovala, rehtori Riitta Moisander, vierailijaprofessori Elina Paasonen, valokuvaaja Jussi Tiainen ja valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä.

Suomen kilpailusarjan voittaja julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18.11.2018 klo 13.00. Tervetuloa!

Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating Wiki Loves Monuments photography contest!

Altogether 3464 images from 98 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The jury members were photography artist Mojo Erämetsä, graphic designer Tommi Kovala, rector Riitta Moisander, visiting professor Elina Paasonen, photographer Jussi Tiainen and photographer Soile Tirilä.

The winner of the Finnish competition will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18 November at 1.00 pm. Welcome!

On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 1 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I realize this may be short notice for some people; I am experimenting with advanced notice times to see what works best for the most people, I'll be giving more warning before the next office hour. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November

The above message says 1 October in the body when it should say 1 November, as the subject line says. Apologies for making a new section by mass message, it's the only way to get this out quickly. See you in twenty minutes! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - copyright and licensing statements

I've posted a second round of designs for modeling copyright and licensing in structured data. These redesigns are based off the feedback received in the first round of designs, and the development team is looking for more discussion. These designs are extremely important for the Commons community to review, as they deal with how copyright and licensing is translated from templates into structured form. I look forward to seeing you over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multilingual captions beta testing

The Structured Data on Commons team has begun beta testing of the first feature, multilingual file captions, and all community members are invited to test it out. Captions is based on designs discussed with the community[3][4] and the team is looking forward to hearing about testing. If all goes well during testing, captions will be turned on for Commons around the second week of January, 2019.

Multilingual captions are plain text fields that provide brief, easily translatable details of a file in a way that is easy to create, edit, and curate. Captions are added during the upload process using the UploadWizard, or they can be added directly on any file page on Commons. Adding captions in multiple languages is a simple process that requires only a few steps.

The details:

There is a help page available on how to use multilingual file captions.
Testing will take place on Beta Commons. If you don’t yet have an account set up there, you’ll need one.
Beta Commons is a testbed, and not configured exactly like the real Commons site, so expect to see some discrepancies with user interface (UI) elements like search.
Structured Data introduces the potential for many important page changes to happen at once, which could flood the recent changes list. Because of this, Enhanced Recent Changes is enabled as it currently is at Commons, but with some UI changes.
Feedback and commentary on the file caption functionality are welcome and encouraged on the discussion page for this post.
Some testing has already taken place and the team are aware of some issues. A list of known issues can be seen below.
If you discover a bug/issue that is not covered in the known issues, please file a ticket on Phabricator and tag it with the “Multimedia” tag. Use this link to file a new task already tagged with "Multimedia."

Known issues:

Search is not currently working on Beta Commons. Search is not needed for testing captions, but service should be restored soon.
Language name display inconsistencies in multilingual file captions
Language names for multilingual File captions can run into the caption value in the mobile view
Deleting a caption field that has text that exceeds the limit does not re-enable the "publish" button
"Edit" tab for past revisions should be "restore"
When using the back button, recently added captions sometimes don't display in Chrome
File Captions can't be edited on mobile browsers
Wrong font weight for some language labels on SDC captions box

Thanks!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk), for the Structured Data on Commons Team 20:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:H. Cegielski self-propelled traction engine (2).webm

Copyright status: File:H. Cegielski self-propelled traction engine (2).webm

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:H. Cegielski self-propelled traction engine (2).webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sk 60, Saab 105 - inside during flight.webm

Copyright status: File:Sk 60, Saab 105 - inside during flight.webm

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sk 60, Saab 105 - inside during flight.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:51, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 November or Thursday, 10 November 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - development update, March 2019

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ihmiset seuraavat televisiolähetystä Volturno Oy n näyteikkunasta.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ihmiset seuraavat televisiolähetystä Volturno Oy n näyteikkunasta.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ihmiset seuraavat televisiolähetystä Volturno Oy n näyteikkunasta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Metrojuna Hakaniemen metroasemalla.jpg

Copyright status: File:Metrojuna Hakaniemen metroasemalla.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Metrojuna Hakaniemen metroasemalla.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: The problem was just the broken license tag? [It is fixed now. --Zache (talk) 01:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thanks for the fixes. Jcb (talk) 10:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - early depicts testing

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lukion taulukot - Archive.org OCR scanned.pdf

File:Lukion taulukot - Archive.org OCR scanned.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abilation (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hei Zache, Wikimedia commonsiin on ladattu paremmin skannattu Lukion taulukot. Tätä ”Archive.org OCR scanned” –versiota ei tarvita, koska nykyisessä versiossa on jo teksti skannattuna. Nyt on ongelmana se, että skannaustapa vaihteli ja etu- ja takakansi ovat ensimmäisillä sivuilla. Seurauksena sivut näyttää Wikiaineistossa sekavalta, kun kuvan viereinen aineisto ei vastaa sitä laisinkaan. --Abilation (talk) 14:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pystyn varmaan acrobatilla säätämään noi sivujen järjestyksen kuntoon, mutta menee pari päivää ennen kuin olen hesassa koneen ääressä jossa mulla on acrobat. --Zache (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Järjestin sivut alkuperäiseen järjestykseen netissä olevalla ilmaisohjelmalla. Ei ongelmaa enää. Laitoin tuon ”Archive.org OCR scanned” –version pikapoistoon. --Abilation (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depicts

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - testing other statements

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Χαίρετε!

Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα επειδή συμμετείχατε προηγουμένως στον ετήσιο διαγωνισμό Wiki Loves Monuments στην Ελλάδα. Θα χαρούμε να συμμετάσχετε και φέτος στο Wiki Loves Monuments και να βοηθήσετε να καταγράψετε την τοπική μας κληρονομιά για τις μελλοντικές γενιές.

Μπορείτε να βρείτε περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες στον ιστότοπο Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Ελλάδα. Ή αν έχετε τραβήξει φωτογραφίες σε άλλες χώρες, μπορείτε να ελέγξετε τις διεθνείς επιλογές. Ο διαγωνισμός του τρέχοντος έτους διαρκεί μέχρι τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2019.

Πολλές ευχαριστίες για τη βοήθειά σας για άλλη μια φορά! --Geraki ^T_L^G 04:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging

The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - modeling data

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:FinnaUploadBot

Moi, Huomasin että sinulla on ainakin aikaisemmin ollut FinnaUploadBot, toimiiko edelleen? Olen itse mukana Projekt Fredrikassa, ja meillä on ollut aikomus kehittää botin jonka avulla voisimme siirtää kuvia Finnasta Commonsiin. Ystävällisin terveisin Lina Fredrika (talk) 08:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ei juuri tällä hetkellä. Mediawiki muutti API-kutsuja suorituskyky-/tietoturvasyistä ja sitä kirjastoa jota tuo käytti pitäisi päivittää sen osalta. Tarkoitus kuitenkin olisi jossain välissä uudelleenkirjoittaa / päivittää tuo. Jos olette tekemässä jotain tuon tyyppistä, niin kannattaa tehdä se pywikibot:n päälle. --Zache (talk) 08:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oletteko muuten siirtämässä yksittäisiä tiedostoja (tyyliin käyttäjä voi valita Finnasta kuvan ja se siirtyy commonsiin) vai massalataamassa useita kuvia kerralla? --Zache (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moi, kiitos nopeasta vastauksesta! Tarkoitus olisi lähinnä massaladata kuvia täältä https://sls.finna.fi/?lng=fi , Svenska litteratursällskapetilla on laaja arkisto ja haluaisivat saada sitä Commonsiin. Lina Fredrika (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip k dick drawing.jpg

File:Philip k dick drawing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2A02:2168:A00:44CB:0:0:0:1 08:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists 2019 selected

Finalistit / Finalists
File:Mannerheim monument.jpg

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 -valokuvauskilpailuun!

Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 1658 kuvaa 66 kuvaajaalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Kotimaisen kilpailun jälleenvalokuvaussarjaan lähetettiin yhteensä 570 kuvaa 26 kuvaajalta Ajapaikissa ja Wikimedia Commonsissa.

Kilpailun henkisinä valmentajina ovat toimineet vastaava metsäkulttuuriasiantuntija Reetta Karhunkorva Metsämuseo Lustosta ja Kolttakulttuurisäätiön asiamies Mari Korpimäki. Tuomaristossa kuvia arvioivat lisäksi Valokuvataiteen museon intendentti Anni Wallenius puheenjohtajana sekä Helsingin kaupunginmuseon kuvakokoelmien tutkija Yki Hytönen, Wikimedia Suomi ry:n hallituksen jäsen Hanna Mäki ja Museoviraston Kuvakokoelmien valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä.

Suomen kilpailusarjan voittaja julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa, Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 29.11.2019 klo 17.00. Tervetuloa!

Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 photography contest!

Altogether 1658 images from 66 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The Finnish competition's re-photography series received 570 images from 26 photographers to Ajapaik and Wikimedia Commons

Two people were invited as mentors to the competition: Senior Forest Culture Specialist Reetta Karhunkorva from Lusto – The Finnish Forest Museum and the Secretary General of the Skolt Sámi Cultural Foundation Mari Korpimäki. The further jury members were intendent Anni Wallenius from the Finnish Museum of Photography as chairperson of the jury, researcher Yki Hytönen from Helsinki City Museum's Picture Collections, Board member Hanna Mäki from Wikimedia Finland and photographer Soile Tirilä from the Photo Collections of the Finnish Heritage Agency.

The winner of the Finnish competition will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier, Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 29 November at 5.00 pm. Welcome!

On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists 2019 selected

Finalistit / Finalists
File:Mannerheim monument.jpg

Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 -valokuvauskilpailuun!

Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 1658 kuvaa 66 kuvaajaalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Kotimaisen kilpailun jälleenvalokuvaussarjaan lähetettiin yhteensä 570 kuvaa 26 kuvaajalta Ajapaikissa ja Wikimedia Commonsissa.

Kilpailun henkisinä valmentajina ovat toimineet vastaava metsäkulttuuriasiantuntija Reetta Karhunkorva Metsämuseo Lustosta ja Kolttakulttuurisäätiön asiamies Mari Korpimäki. Tuomaristossa kuvia arvioivat lisäksi Valokuvataiteen museon intendentti Anni Wallenius puheenjohtajana sekä Helsingin kaupunginmuseon kuvakokoelmien tutkija Yki Hytönen, Wikimedia Suomi ry:n hallituksen jäsen Hanna Mäki ja Museoviraston Kuvakokoelmien valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä.

Suomen kilpailusarjojen voittajat julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa, Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 29.11.2019 klo 17.00. Tervetuloa!

Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 photography contest!

Altogether 1658 images from 66 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The Finnish competition's re-photography series received 570 images from 26 photographers to Ajapaik and Wikimedia Commons

Two people were invited as mentors to the competition: Senior Forest Culture Specialist Reetta Karhunkorva from Lusto – The Finnish Forest Museum and the Secretary General of the Skolt Sámi Cultural Foundation Mari Korpimäki. The further jury members were intendent Anni Wallenius from the Finnish Museum of Photography as chairperson of the jury, researcher Yki Hytönen from Helsinki City Museum's Picture Collections, Board member Hanna Mäki from Wikimedia Finland and photographer Soile Tirilä from the Photo Collections of the Finnish Heritage Agency.

The winners of the Finnish competitions will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier, Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 29 November at 5.00 pm. Welcome!

On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 03:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zache,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SoundsOfChangesReview

Template:SoundsOfChangesReview has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zache,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unsorted_pictures_of_Helsinki

Unsorted pictures of Helsinki has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 09:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joku kuva.jpg

File:Joku kuva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons - Media Search

Greetings,

The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Campaign:wlm-in-wikidata

Hi, taking inspiration from Campaign:wlm-fi-rephotography-wikidata and Module:Cultural Heritage Finland wikidata id, I have created Campaign:wlm-in-wikidata, {{WLM India Wikidata ID}}, and Module:WLM India Wikidata ID. However, the latter is no giving the desired output. Let me first explain the context; in India, we have at least three different monument identifiers (ASI Monument ID (P1371), World Heritage Site ID (P757), and HPIP ID (P5094)), so instead of having three different set of instructions or upload wizards, it was thought it would be best if we do this through Wikidata. If the campaign works fine, participants enter Wikidata ID of the monument in to the wizard or it is prefilled from the list, and it checks which of the above mentioned three properties exist in the respective Wikidata item, and insert that in the file description page - along with the property and its value.

I have created the above module based on the Finnish model, based on the suggestions by Susanna. But it doesn't seem to work fine, please see a test file File:Test_-_to_be_deleted_soon.png using the template, uploaded through the campaign. It would be very helpful if you can help us to get this working. Thank you, KCVelaga (talk · mail) 16:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you try to do something like this: User:Zache/testing (diff Module:WLM_India_Wikidata_ID)? --Zache (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, exactly! Thanks a ton - this is so helpful. We will integrate this with the main campaign Campaign:wlm-in. We have one last issue - we want to the Wikidata ID to be pre-filled into the upload link, from lists such as this. It uses {{India heritage list row}} template for the same. We made this edit so that the Wikidata item number is pre-filled, instead of the ASI ID, but the prefilled link is taking the whole [[:d:Q17986872|Q17986872]] instead of just the QID, into the link. For example, in "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:uploadWizard?campaign=wlm-in&id=%5B%5B%3Ad%3AQ17783011%7CQ17783011%5D%5D&descriptionlang=en&description=" the part "id=%5B%5B%3Ad%3AQ17783011%7CQ17783011%5D%5D" should just be having the QID instead of the whole inter-wiki link thing. Please help in fixing in this. If it is resolved, the campaign will be full functional. Also, in the campaign, we want to know if the "Wikidata ID" can be completely hidden for participants i.e. not giving a chance to vandalise the pre-filled text. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 06:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@KCVelaga: This should be doing it (diff). However, i don't know why the other {{{item|}}} links are working without cleaning up.--Zache (talk) 06:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you need to ask @Romaine: or someobody other more skilled with campaigns to know if the id:s can be hidden. --Zache (talk) 07:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the issue is resolved now. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 07:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Juuan kirkko ja tapuli (museovirasto.ef907ce3-fda6-4c28-a64f-f8af627f23db).tif

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juuan kirkko ja tapuli (museovirasto.ef907ce3-fda6-4c28-a64f-f8af627f23db).tif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 10:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs_by

Category:Photographs_by has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Mind matrix 22:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with Campaign:wlm-in

Hi Zache, I need some help in Campaign:wlm-in. I want to get the P373 value pre-filled or auto-added in the category parameter of the campaign upload wizard whenever a QID is pre-filled through Template:India heritage list row. It would be very helpful if you can help us to get this working. Thank you. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vantaa_in_the_1940s

Vantaa in the 1940s has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FinnaUploadBotin ohjaus

Onko mahdollista käskyttää FinnaUploadBottia hakemaan Finnasta tiettyjä kuvia? Mielessä ei ole massatuonti, vaan tietyt yksittäiset tai muutamat kuvat jotka on aina sidottuja tiettyyn kategoriaan.
Esim. tällä hetkellä toisin kuvia liittyen Vaasan vesitorniin, koska sen kuvista on selkeä puute; kuvia on vain yksi, ja sekin matalaresoluutioinen. —Nelg (talk, contribs) 17:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ゆずソフト「サノバウィッチ」OPムービー.webm

File:ゆずソフト「サノバウィッチ」OPムービー.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dracu-riot! front.jpg

File:Dracu-riot! front.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of book cover

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BriefEdits (talk) 05:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANU Notice

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Zache. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dracu-riot!- Mirai-chan 6946789142.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stang^★ 16:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. I replied with the explanation to the nomination page why I think that the Flickr copyright status could be trusted. -- Zache (talk) 17:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipe-tan visual novel screencap

Hello Zache. I was wondering: would you happen to know which visual novel this screencap comes from? According to the description, it appears to be derived from two free licensed images rather than an actual visual novel (or ren'py, eroge, adventure game etc). I'd be interested in reading any feedback you have on the matter, especially in regards to categorization. Thanks. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on googling renpy images I think that they are just created by installing renpy software, taking some example, adding foreground and bacgrounds and text to it, and running the result and taking screencapture. -- Zache (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zache, thanks for your reply. That doesn't appear to be the case here, the file's description states only that it was created using two free-licensed images, and a reverse image search revealed no visual novel which includes this particular screencap.

On a side note, you're obviously aware that all screencaps are, by definition, artificial; ie produced by human agency as opposed to occurring naturally. The term "artifical screencap" is somewhat redundant, as every screencap on this project is artificial. Thanks for your time. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Finna copyupload-listalle

Hei Zache, osaatko neuvoa, että kannattaisiko Finnaa pyytää lisättäväksi tälle listalle? Jos Finnasta voisi sitten tallentaa suoraan kuvia ilman, että niitä tarvitsee ensin tallentaa omalle koneelleen? Lähinnä mietin, että tiedätkö olisiko siihen jokin tekninen syy ettei se toimisi. kyykaarme (talk) 12:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kannattaa sitä ainakin ehdottaa. En ole ihan varma miten tiukkoja nuo on sen kanssa, että jos siellä on sekä tekijänoikeuksien alaista, että vapaastilisensoitua aineistoa, mutta olisihan se kätevää jos Finna olisi tuolla listalla. -- Zache (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyykaarme tein muokkauspyynnön: [5] Zache (talk) 10:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiitos :) kyykaarme (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming files

Will you go to this category and request new names for all of the files you uploaded under your Zache (WMFI) account (should be all of the files in that category)? There are 16 images that have no description or author information. Thanks! ···日本穣 ^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. --Zache (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AutoWikiBrowser Ubuntu screenshot

Hey! Just wanted to inquire about your screenshot here. Could I ask about the technical details regarding it; whether you used Wine, and the version of Ubuntu, perhaps? Thanks! Silikonz (talk) 03:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu was either Ubuntu 16.04 LTS or more likely Ubuntu 16.10. However, I cannot remember if the screenshot was from Mono or Wine. --Zache (talk) 05:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the clarification. Silikonz (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot of Ajapaik Android app my favorites view.jpg

Hi Zache, I assume that the 4 photographies on the depicted smartphone screen are not originally our own work, right? --Túrelio (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of adding the copyright information, but TLDR: The UI is from Ajapaik Android app (developed by WMFI and Ajapaik) and elements by google should be open licensed.[6]. I can ask VTRS permision if it is needed. Bigger task is also describe also all the photos which are in the screenshots. They are also open licensed but the license can be varied between PD, CC-BY-SA and CC-BY. --Zache (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. If you are taking care of that, I don't need to problem-tag them. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added now info to the first one is File:Screenshot of Ajapaik Android app my favorites view.jpg. Say if there is something missing. -- Zache (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Just repeat that with the similar images in Category:Ajapaik Android app. --Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cirno - Taisei Project - 2019-07-03.webp

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kirisame Marisa - Taisei 1.3.1 - 20190923 00-43-28-277 (cropped to square).png

And also:

File:Kirisame Marisa - Taisei Project - 2019-07-03.webp

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 13:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cirno - Taisei 1.3.1 20190922 20-41-08-877.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Zache,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Omeka-S - Näyttökuva 2021-11-9 kello 10.17.28.png

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Omeka-S - Näyttökuva 2021-11-9 kello 10.17.28.png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Masur (talk) 06:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it's GPL OS why did you claimed the authorship and made it CC? I will restore it, but please correct the author/license/spurce data. Thank you. Masur (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can't remember any more why the licence was CC. Probably tt was mistake by me. Question, the very small image thumbnails are from public domain art by age (Images are afaik also uploaded also in commons) so they are OK. However, when I looked the image on laptop, it includes OS X user interface elements (browser tabs and browser url-bar with icons). These OS X elements should be cropped out? --Zache (talk) 07:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now they are cropped. --Zache (talk) 08:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Scuttle - Taisei Project - 2019-07-03.webp

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Scuttle - Taisei Project - 2019-07-03.webp, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Larryasou (talk) 11:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that it is ok now? --Zache (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hack4fi

Hack4fi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip K Dick android missing head.jpg

File:Philip K Dick android missing head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Belbury (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Electrical typewriter by IBM from 1988.webm

Hello. Don't you know what's the ID of this model? Isn't it another version of IBM 6788 I own and created a category for? Regards, Drogosław (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say that don't have any more detailed information than what there was in original page as I have just uploaded the video. Video is part of the Commons:Work With Sounds project (projects current name is Sounds of changes) and based on description it was made by Erik Pålsson of w:Museum of Work in Norrköping, Sweden. Device in the video is most likely in their collections. So my guess is that you could try to ask the more detailed information from them ( email arbetslivsmuseer [ at ] arbetetsmuseum.se ; Helena Thörnqvist is contact person per soundofchanges contact info and arbetetsmuseum.se kontakt ) --Zache (talk) 02:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luokka Jean Sibelius by decade – malline Jean Sibelius by decade

Hei Zache (ja @Ipr1). Tein Jean Sibeliukselle alaluokan Jean Sibelius by decade (vertaa Urho Kekkonen by decade). Sitten huomasin, että mallinetta {{Jean Sibelius by decade}} on käytetty mallineen {{Century decades navbox}} sijasta. Se luokitteli pääluokkaan, jolloin muokkasin mallinetta. Jean Sibelius in the 1930s on nyt kahdessa luokassa. Olisitko osannut sanoa, miten malline korjataan? Onko jatkossa parempi käyttää yleistä navigaatiomallinetta vai tehdä jokaiselle uusi? Tuntuu hankalalta korjata vanhojen mallineiden luokittelua tai käyttää yksilöllisesti tehtyä. raid5 17:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nähtävästi {{Century decades navbox}} on käytetty pohjamallineena teoksien ja kaupunkien mallineille mutta ei juurikaan henkilöille. Ehkä tuo on ok, mutta saattaisi olla parempi käyttää suoraan. Ehkä jollain muulla on parempaa tietoa asiasta. Ipr1 (talk) 17:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vaihdoin mallineen, jolloin luokitus korjaantui. Kiitos vastauksesta. raid5 18:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perceptual hashing

Hi! I'm watching the closing ceremony of hackaton (unfortunately I couldn't attend to), and just saw your quick presentation about perceptual hashing, nice work! This is something I'm working on for some years for my tool Commons:Spacemedia, I currently have a trove database with 68 millions hashes that are computed on a small Cloud VPS instance, but I don't reach your computing speed! Would you be available at some time to have a chat? I'd love to coordinate our efforts, if possible :) vip (talk) 13:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and sure! About the speed, I think that the trick is basically that inside WMF labs you are less likely to hit throttling + you can download full size images so the wikimedia commons internal scaling delay is not the issue. --Zache (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perceptual hashing again

Hi Zache ... I read your village pump proposal about perceptual hashing with interest. My team has a ticket for something similar phab:T362352. I notice that you have a talk at wikimania this year - I'm going to wikimania myself, so perhaps we could find time to talk through what you're doing and see if we have common ground? CParle (WMF) (talk) 13:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CParle (WMF) Yes, i would be interested. We could also ask @Don-vip to join if he is coming to Wikimania as he is running similar hashing for Commons:Spacemedia uploads. Also, thank you very much for the ticket, I had missed that even though i have tried to follow imagehashing tickets in phabricator. --Zache (talk) 08:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Zache@CParle (WMF), yes, I'll be there, I just registered \o/ It will be my first Wikimania and I will really enjoy discuss this with you :) vip (talk) 21:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great! Shall we just meet up after the lightning talks session on the Thursday? Or do you want to schedule something else? If you spot me just say hello at any time - there's an image on my talk page and I'm easily recognisable from my long grey hair :) CParle (WMF) (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @Pintoch from OpenRefine is interested as well! :) vip (talk) 08:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]