User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Deleted RIAN files

After Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos by Mark Markov-Grinberg I'm interested in knowing if there were any more RIAN files deleted for invalid reasons. Is there a list available of all RIAN photos initially uploaded under their agreement, or a way to see why other RIAN files were deleted? I understand some were deleted for FOP reasons but there may be others that were deleted for similarly invalid reasons. Kges1901 (talk) 17:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kges1901: Hi, I don't know any list. The best way is to search deletion requests mentioning RIAN, but it may not even be sufficient. Yann (talk) 17:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kges1901: As I said on UDR, in such cases, RIAN / TASS should be mentioned in the description. The nominator or the admin can't be blamed if the information is not available in the description. Yann (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Risk.jpg

You deleted Alvin Risk.jpg in response to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alvin Risk.jpg. @Skr888 was completely incorrect. The video is officially licensed as CC-BY 3.0, which is stated in the info tab under thr description. @Túrelio pointed this out at 7:16, then you deleted the page over 2 hours later.

Why? Roastedbeanz1 (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reviewed the license. Yann (talk) 17:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request for File:Brown rat distribution.png

Hello, Yann.

Can you temporarily protect File:Brown rat distribution.png (which you did back in January, for a duration of two months)? I reverted the map (which is used by numerous articles across Wikipedia) to its original upload version. Other users put the man-made boundaries of Alberta to the map, depicting the whole province as devoid of the species brown rat (rattus norvegicus), which is false and baseless. This large province has a population of brown rats, and they do not stop at its invisible border. Brown rats are detected in the province and are often reported in the news.

The unused SVG version shows the unfounded claim of Alberta being "rat free".

The PNG map (which numerous Wikipedia articles already use) should remain the original way it was uploaded, without the man-made borders of Alberta. The later dubious addition of Alberta in the map, was the reason why the PNG map was removed in the English Wikipedia article en:brown rat, years ago.

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 11:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Semi-protected for a year. Yann (talk) 14:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Oirattas (talk) 00:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I will address each of the alleged violations individually as indicated, but I have to address that the single request from any editor about anything that I posted was a recent commentary about a main menu picture of the Disco Elysium game. I did not upload copyrighted media out of spite or ill intentions, but mostly because I was not aware of its regulation on Wikimedia/Wikipedia. The violations from 9 months ago happened in the course of a few days (so I was not advised on the spot that I shouldn't post them because they break copyright rules) and, back then, I thought that it was a zealous error from a bot. I kindly request that the warning on my talk page be revised to match the reality.

Have a good day -- Icsitmua (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would say that you are lucky to only get a warning now. Please do not upload any more copyright violations, and you will be fine. Yann (talk) 16:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ottavio Baussano

Hello. It appears you have undeleted the files mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ottavio Baussano. Please update the DR and please remove the delete template from the files. Thx. --Krd 16:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did a mistake pasting the URL from where I got the image. Now it's updated! Yuanga (talk) 17:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I updated and reviewed the license. Yann (talk) 18:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montage Bordeaux.jpg

Hi! Why not just revert to an older version where the copyrighted photo was not included? --MGA73 (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion of File:The Angel Next Door Spoils Me Rotten logo.svg and others

Hi,

The following files were deleted because I tagged them with SD (G7):

  1. File:Strike Witches logo.svg
  2. File:Brave Witches logo.svg
  3. File:A Place Further than the Universe logo.svg
  4. File:The Elusive Samurai logo.svg
  5. File:The Angel Next Door Spoils Me Rotten logo.svg

But I think the deletion request would have been better for these. So can you please restore these files?

Thanks, Momiji-Penguin (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick response to my requests Momiji-Penguin (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:King's Speech 2024 (cropped).jpg

Hello! File:King's Speech 2024 (cropped).jpg, a file I created using CropTool, was deleted because of questions over the Flickr license. The result of this discussion over the original image was keep. Would you considering reversing this action? Thank you! Walco1 (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

titleblacklist is case insensitive by default

mw:Extension:TitleBlacklist says need to use attribute <casesensitive> per line to have the phrase toggle from the default  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was meaning that your complex regex in the form used is the same phrase repeated four times at the moment. If you wanted case sensitive you need to amend. I was trying to say that it is either overkill or going to miss specifics if you wanted to be case sensitive alone.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:BSicon dCONT3+g-.svg

Hi, Yann. Why was File:BSicon dCONT3+g-.svg deleted, and speedy to boot? The description found on this page by uploader suggest it is their own work. Best, — Sam Sailor 18:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see now it was moved. Why not leave the redirect behind? Sam Sailor 19:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: User:Useddenim asked for deletion. Do we need a redirect? Yann (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. No, a redirect is not needed now. The situation allowed me to learn something about {{en:Routemap}} and figure out what to do, once I understood that the file had been moved. My apologies for not seeing the picture before asking you. Best, Sam Sailor 19:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: because of the complexities of BSicon naming, the practice has been to speedily delete redirects for incorrectly-named icons. A bad name can (and has) cause(d) other incorrectly-named icons to be uploaded, and a correct but wrong name simply occupies a spot that may be needed for the proper icon at some point in the future (which is then more difficult to correct and may need an admin's help "because it's existed for x length of time"). Useddenim (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
​In cases like this where the outcome is in effect the same as a move done with suppressredirect, checking the file usage on other wikis and correcting the name in pages where it is used should be part of normal post-move procedure. — Sam Sailor 07:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sam Sailor: yes, I know; but for some reason Move & replace doesn't always change all the occurrences of an icon, and I occasionally forget to check Special:GlobalUsage. Useddenim (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/912644214

The archive area spans two sections. Was that on purpose? --Geohakkeri (talk) 22:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done No, that's a bug from the closing tool. Thanks for noticing. Yann (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yann. I hope you're doing well. This is second time you deleted the category "Category:Ankara by medium‎". Despite my warning, a user is repeatedly emptying this page and nominating it as a speedy deletion. I am really sick of this situation because I already tried to explain it. He also led to deletion of "Category:WikiProject Ankara", which was also efficiently used. I do not think that these pages should be deleted. --Görkem Yavuz (talk) 16:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Görkem Yavuz: Please discuss this with User:Adamant1, and/or on any other relevant boards (COM:VP?). Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Görkem Yavuz: I suggest the Village Pump as the next step since all you did when I tried to talk to you about it on your talk page was act dishonest and then not answer my question about if there are other examples of categories for "cities by medium" since your claiming it's a common practice. There isn't really isn't anything else to discuss about this on my end out side of that though. Either "cities by medium" are a common type of category as you claimed or they aren't and therefore having the category deleted was justified. There isn't really anything else to discuss beyond that as far as I'm concerned though. As to the deletion of "Category:WikiProject Ankara", as far as I know there is no "Wikiproject Ankara" on here or any other project. So the category was totally pointless. Otherwise be my guest and point out a "Wikiproject Ankara" here or anywhere else. I'm sure you'll just ignore that like you did the other question though. So again, be my guest and take it up on the Village Pump if you think there should be categories for non-exiting Wikiprojects, but the categories should stay deleted until then. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that much hard to type and search for it. Quick examples:
All these categories are for listing different types of media about cities and this cannot be considered as overcategorisation. Yes, there is nothing to discuss because everything is obvious except your nonsense insistence. --Görkem Yavuz (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)‎[reply]
I asked for categories of cities "by medium" not "by media type." I'm sure you get the difference. Regardless, your claim was that it's "common practice." I'd hardly call it common based on the two categories in your list. Even if I were to include the ones "by media type" that still doesn't make it common. Let alone that worth doing in this particular instance.
But say I indulge you with the two categories on your list for a second. There's this little thing on here called the University Principle. Ergo, "the categorization structure should be as systematical and unified as possible." Looking at Category:Medium that category seems to be about the middle of things and/or "sizes of adjectives." Which makes sense. As "medium" doesn't usually refer to a type of computer file, which seems to be how you trying to use it.
Category names shouldn't be ambiguous either. If your intended purpose for "medium" is "type of file" but everyone else's is "the middle of something" then clearly your usage is the problem here. Really, the only thing your list shows me is that the other categories should be deleted along with Category:Ankara by medium. I'd say the same for the ones based on "media type" to. They aren't really much better. You obviously didn't put any kind of actual thought into this beyond the juvenile insults and condescension on your talk page though. Anyway, that's all I have to say about it. Apologies to Yann for the back and forth on his talk page. I'm still willing to discuss this on the Village Pump if you want to take it there. But I'm done with it outside of that. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:PIA05248 label.jpg

Can you review this deletion, please? The nomination reason was resolved by me adding a source, and there were two keep votes. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done OOPS, wrong button. Sorry. I intended to keep it. Yann (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taris, roi de l'eau (1931) par Jean Vigo.webm

File:Taris, roi de l'eau (1931) par Jean Vigo.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:SelfStarter2

I saw after indef-blocking User:SelfStarter2 that you had given them a warning, and that they had no subsequent edits after that warning. I hope it's OK with you that I blocked them. Let me know if you really think I was wrong. My own view is that their conduct was such that there was virtually no chance of them becoming a positive contributor. - Jmabel ! talk 04:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine for me. Yann (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Ghani Akbar Dress Photo

Please explain why the photo was deleted. thanks Max64958 (talk) 20:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Max64958: We need either evidence that the file is under a free license or in the public domain, or a permission from the copyright holder. Please do not copy files from the Internet unless you have any of this, and please read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: deletion (what else?)

2024-08-24T15:44:08 Yann talk contribs deleted page File:Spill worker with respirator hoses beach during Corexit application test- Quayle Beach, Smith Island (Prince William Sound), August 8, 1989.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)}

Do you mind telling me the listed source for this file? There's a PD image source related to the Exxon Valdez oil spill that's been problematic for years due to a more recent tendency to disregard common sense. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 22:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RadioKAOS: Wmcgovernak wrote that they copied the file from [1], that they don't know the author, and they didn't provide a license. We need either evidence that the file is under a free license or in the public domain, or a permission from the copyright holder. Please do not copy files from the Internet unless you have any of this, and please read COM:L. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories of Sevastopol by raion

Please return category - Category:Categories of Sevastopol by raion. Mitte27 (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitte27: The category is not yet empty, but it should be replaced by Category:Sevastopol by raion. Yann (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Other similar categories have the same name. — Category:Categories of Ukraine by region by raion. --Mitte27 (talk) 10:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mitte27: These are redundant. There is no point to have categories such as "Category:Categories of X". "Category:X" is sufficient. Yann (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take a moment to look at this

This file history shows that I marked the fie as missing permission. Esther Bruton died in, if I recall correctly, 1992, The uploader states "Per Oct 25, 2023 email from Katherine Ets-Hokin, Librarian Archivist San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library, 100 Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, sfpl.org/sfhistory, 415.557.4527: No permission is required to use our photos on Wikipedia Commons, we just request that you use a hyperlinked credit line."

The key element for me is that the photographer of the original piece is likely to be the copyright owner, not the San Francisco Public Library. This I believe that their permission, not the library's, is needed.

I have asked the reverting editor for their rationale, especially since, generally, we "challenge" SD nominations, not revert them. No response though they have edited further since.

I have no desire, nor intention, to get into a revert war, hence my request to you for advice, including, please, any necessary flagging of this file for any form of deletion. You have already given advice to the uploader. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Esther Bruton and Victor Arnautoff (1936).jpg. Whoever is the author, it is quite possible to be in the public domain due to lack of copyright notice, or renewal. Yann (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I am grateful for your work on this. I understand the point you are making. I have no wish to fall out with the other editor. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermaphroditus - Bronze - 1.jpg

Hi Yann. A week ago you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hermaphroditus - Bronze - 1.jpg as "deleted", but it looks like you forgot to delete the file itself. Cheers, Crawdad Blues (talk) 23:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lenartowicz4listopad2005monterey.pdf

Here is a permission for the note that Piotr Lenartowicz wrote to me which I uploaded.


From: Curia PMA <curiapma@jezuici.pl> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:39:54 +0200 Subject:Re: Piotr Lenartowicz, SJ To: xxx

Szanowny Panie Profesorze,

Wszelkie listy, czy notatki skierowane przez o. Piotra do Pana, są własnością adresata, a my, jako Prowincja Wielkopolsko-Mazowiecka Towarzystwa Jezusowego, nie mamy żadnych zastrzeżeń do ich publikowania.

Bardzo dziękuję za zajęcie się umieszczeniem informacji o ojcu Piotrze na Wikipedii. W najbliższych dniach przejrzę je dokładnie i ewentualnie odezwę się.

Z poważaniem, Wojciech Żmudziński SJ


Here is my translation to English

From: Curia PMA <curiapma@jezuici.pl> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:39:54 +0200 Subject: Re: Piotr Lenartowicz, SJ To: xxx

Dear Professor,

All letters or notes sent by Father Piotr to you are the property of the recipient, and we, as the Greater Poland-Mazovia Province of the Society of Jesus, have no objections to their publication.

Thank you very much for taking the time to include information about Father Piotr on Wikipedia. In the coming days, I will review it thoroughly and will possibly get back to you.

Sincerely, Wojciech Żmudziński SJ Puncinus (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Puncinus: Hi, Please send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, and see COM:VRT for other details. Yann (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I emailed this permission from the Catholic Jesuit order and my translation into English. Why was this file deleted within a day or two? Is this really the case that letters and notes copyright belong to the sender? Thanks. Puncinus (talk) 23:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Puncinus: Yes, the copyright belongs to the author. Do you have the ticket of the permission ? If not, please be patient. The file will be undeleted when the permission is validated by one of the volunteers. Yann (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grotte aux Apogons Esterel juillet 92.jpg

Bonjour,

Merci pour vos précisions, j'ai modifié les informations en conséquence. L'image est désormais publiée en CC-BY-NC-ND. J'ai mis mon pseudo en nom d'auteur, mais la mention source ne laisse aucun doute quant au fait que c'est le travail de mon père. S ijamais ça ne convient toujours pas, merci de bien vouloir indiquer les modifications à effectuer pour être dans les règles.

Bien cordialement,
FSTH000 (talk) 10:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FSTH000: Bonjour, Les licences non commerciales ne sont pas autorisées sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

أعتذر عن رفع الصور بطريقة خاطئة

أعتذر عن رفع الصور بطريقة خاطئة الرجاء العفو عني Radhy365 (talk) 10:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A tornado funnel is shown moving through Xenia.jpg

File:A tornado funnel is shown moving through Xenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rlandmann (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:Dirk Hoke MSC 2019.jpg

Hello, you deleted File:Dirk Hoke MSC 2019.jpg because the license stated at https://securityconference.org/impressum/ is not compatible. However, this statement has been changed after the file was published. In 2019, the file was licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany License as you can see here: https://web.archive.org/web/20191009142132/https://securityconference.org/en/imprint/. Thus, I think it should be restored. D3rT!m (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done License reviewed. Yann (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. D3rT!m (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of files 26 Aug 2024

hello. on this date you deleted some copyrighted files I uploaded. Sorry for that, however these 4 files were my own work: File:Stazione di Piraineto.jpg, File:Stazione Isola delle Femmine Entrata.jpg, File:Stazione Isola delle Femmine.png, File:Carini Torre Ciachea.jpg. Is there anyway to bring them back, and if not, could I upload them back? Simoxan (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Simoxan: Hi, Why so small? Please upload the original files with EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Category:Historical images of Milan

Hi I was wondering why on earth delete a top category that might contain obviously historical images of Milan that are not traceable, as far as we know, to any recognized photographer. I also think that if you ever wanted to move images to the History of Milan category IMO it is a mistake because it should only contain categories related to precise historical events and not generic images that are considered historical. I also confess that I don't know exactly from what year it can be considered a historical photograph, do you have a guideline on this? Thank you for your attention. :-) Threecharlie (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greed (1924) by Erich von Stroheim.webm

As i mentioned before, the original file is a fanmade reconstruction of the general release version i created and uploaded to the Internet Archive back in 2016. It was assembled, alongside footage from the 1999 reconstrucion (already uploaded in Commons by a third party), in SD so to keep the quality of the VHS main source.

I suggest to overwrite the windowboxed file with the original IA video file which is under a Public Domain Mark. --Mayimbú (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lauren Bacall by Bernard Gotfryd.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lauren Bacall by Bernard Gotfryd.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA with new IP address

Hi, @Ferret has previously blocked this /32 range (Special:Contributions/2001:4452:0:0:0:0:0:0/32) on the English Wikipedia as the LTA en:User:SwissArmyGuy. The same IP range is now targeting my edits and making nonsensical comments/edits. A portion of the IP range has already been blocked (Special:Contributions/2001:4452:1B2:1F00:0:0:0:0/64) here on Commons, but I think the whole /32 needs to be blocked. Freedom4U (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=917452330"