Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Technically indistinguishable |
Likely | Possilikely |
Possible | Unlikely |
Inconclusive | Unrelated |
No action | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
[edit]Shielda
[edit]- Shielda (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Tonkatie (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Adeonunde (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Accounts created within 2 days, all uploading the same kind of files. This looks like fishing for people who got prank calls. Please check for sleepers. Yann (talk) 11:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- No account has edited since 30 April 2024, thus all would be Stale. Эlcobbola talk 13:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK thanks. I blocked the accounts for spamming, and fishing for scams. Yann (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
A3cb1
[edit]- A3cb1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Silini22 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Usual edit pattern.--2A02:9130:94B6:6308:60B7:DF8E:A3A8:1908 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. --Krd 13:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
PlanespotterA320
[edit]- PlanespotterA320 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- 70.34.229.242 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Same behavior of nominating images for deletion based on hypothetical copyright doubts. Highly suspicious that an IP user would be able to discuss obscure aspects of copyright and file deletion requests. --Kges1901 (talk) 13:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Declined - Please review COM:RFCU, including "The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses." Эlcobbola talk 14:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- IMO this should not apply for banned users. So in view of the evidence, I blocked the IP for a week. Yann (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The CheckUser policy does not care about your opinion, Yann. Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives